Disposed

Chandrakumari v. The Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC21 Oct 2021WP/22257/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's appeal submitted on 18.10.2019 within sixteen weeks, after a previous writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to an underlying inquiry proceeding. The court did not express an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to dispose of the appeal dated 18.10.2019 within sixteen weeks offering sufficient opportunity.

Chandrakumari Vs The Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 21.10.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶5

W.P. NO.22257 OF 2021

Mrs.Chandrakumari,

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam,

¶10

Chennai - 600 028.

¶11

The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Electronics Complex, Thiru. Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to pass an order based on the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2019 and pass appropriate orders accordingly.

¶14

For Petitioner	::	Mr.M.Mohamed Hasain
For Respondents	::	Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan
		(Government Advocate)

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to pass an order based on the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2019 and pass appropriate orders accordingly.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents as well as perused the material available on records.

¶19

Having considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that the District Registrar, North Region, has passed proceeding No. 12486/A5/2017 dated 16.08.2019 based on the enquiry conducted on 03.10.2018 during the pendency of W.P.22992 of 2019. In view of the above, the aforesaid Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous by order dated 03.09.2021 of this Court. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid proceeding No.12486/A5/2017 dated 16.08.2019 passed by the District Registrar, North Region, the petitioner has preferred an appeal by presenting representation dated 18.10.2019 before the 2nd respondent herein. Further, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 25.09.2021 to the 1st respondent herein seeking for direction to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate order based on the petitioner's appeal dated 18.10.2019. As there is no reply nor orders on the aforesaid representation dated 18.10.2019 made by the petitioner herein on the side of the respondents herein so far, this Court without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, direct the respondents to dispose of the appeal dated 18.10.2019 made by the petitioner herein within a period of Sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner herein.

¶20

In the result, the Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed if any. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

Lbm

¶26

To:

¶27

The Inspector General of Registration,

¶28

Department of Registration,

¶29

Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam,

¶30

Chennai - 600 028.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Electronics Complex, Thiru. Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

¶33

+2ccs to M/s.S.Anbalagan, Advocate, S.R.No.54067

¶34

W.P. No.22257 of 2021

¶35

SMI(CO) RLP(07/01/2022)

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chandrakumari v. The Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakumari v. The Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Thangam Vs The District Registrar

G.v.Devendiran, Vs The District Collector

P.Rajangam Vs The Tahsildar

A.Kanthappan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

D.Balasundaram Vs The District Revenue officer

R.Natarajan Vs The Inspector General of Registration