3.Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that the subject property situated at Pammal Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chengai M.G.R. District, (Now Kancheepuram District) comprised in Old S.No.99/1 Part, New Survey No.93/3A1 ad-measuring 9801 Sq.Ft was purchased by way of Sale Certificate in E.P.No.48 of 2006 dated 10.03.2006 in O.A.No.420 of 2001 passed by the Hon'ble Presiding Officer Debts Recovery TribunalI, Chennai, under Section 19(22) of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial Institutions Act, 1993 and the same was registered in the name of the petitioner in Document No.6130/I2015 on the file of the SRO, Pammal. Ever since from the date of purchase, the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the same without any hindrance and encumbrance. While being so, the petitioner preferred a representation dated 21.07.2017 to the 1st respondent requesting to issue Patta in his name for the subject property. In pursuance of the said representation, enquiry was conducted and thereby an order of proceedings in Pa.Mu.No.1589/2017/A1 dated 02.03.2018 has been passed to issue Patta in the name of the petitioner after carrying out the necessary corrections. Even though there is a proceedings in Pa.Mu.No.1589/2017/A1 dated 02.03.2018 passed by the Tahsildar, Pallavaram, to issue Patta in the name of the petitioner after carrying out necessary correction as per the instructions mentioned in the said proceedings, the petitioner has not issued Patta so far. Hence, the 2nd respondent is directed to pass
