Disposed

P.Anandan, v. The District Collector

Madras HC7 Dec 2021WP/22036/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition sought a writ of mandamus directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to dismiss an appeal and cancel a joint patta. The High Court closed the petition as the impugned order had already been passed by the respondent court on 16.03.2016 after the petition was filed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were closed due to the disposal of the underlying appeal; no specific relief was granted.

P.Anandan, Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P. No.22036 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

P.Anandan

.. Petitioner

-Vs-

The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 3. The Deputy Thasildar, Palacode Division, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Jarthalaw Revenue Village, Themmampatti, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose the petitioner's appeal dated 23.01.2014 and the subsequent reminder dated 18.07.2014 and pass order by cancelling the joint patta issued by the third respondent within a stipulated period.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Anbarasu

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.P.Baladhandayutham Special Government Pleader.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose the petitioner's appeal dated 23.01.2014 and the subsequent reminder dated 18.07.2014 and pass order by cancelling the joint patta issued by the third respondent within a stipulated period.

¶16

The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that while pending this Writ Petition, the second respondent considered the petitioner's appeal dated 23.01.2014 and passed order on 16.03.2016 itself.

¶17

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

rts

¶23

¶24

The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶25

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶26

The Deputy Thasildar, Palacode Division, Dharmapuri District.

¶27

The Village Administrative Officer, Jarthalaw Revenue Village, Themmampatti,

¶28

Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

+1cc to the Government Pleader, SR.No.65297

¶31

W.P. No.22036 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶32

PA(CO) CB(27/12/2021)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Anandan, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Anandan, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Pichan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Immanuel John Vs The Collector

A.Venkatabathi Vs The Tahsildar

Siddavatam Subramaniyam Vs The District Collector

V.Kaalimuthu Vs The District Collector

Karan Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police