S.Selvan v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged lack of action regarding a survey summons. The Court was informed the relief was already granted and issued a fresh summons. The Court disposed of the writ petition as closed without costs upon this confirmation.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as the relief (survey summons) was already granted. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.20364 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.20364 of 2020
S.Selvan .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The District Collector,
Chennai – 600 001.
2.The Tahsildar,
Maduravoyal Taluk.
3.Dayasadan Agarwal Vidyalaya,
rep. by its Administrator,
Poonamallee High Road,
Nerkundram,
Chennai – 600 107. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to initiate appropriate action to conduct the survey of the property bearing S.No.448/1 and 2, Old S.No.80/1 and 2 respectively located at No.14, Nerkundram Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Chennai by issuing
Page 1 of 4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requiring a survey be closed upon confirmation that the relief has been granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Selvan
- respondent
District Collector, Chennai
- respondent
Tahsildar, Maduravoyal Taluk
- respondent
Dayasadan Agarwal Vidyalaya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court