The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as dismissed for no instruction received from the petitioner appearing for over three to four occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 07.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.20291 of 2007
C.Chinnakannu
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chief Executive Officer,
Tamilnadu Khadi and Village Industries Board,
Kuralagam, Chennai 108.
2.The Assistant Director
of Khadi & Village Industries,
Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in
Na.Ka.No.1082/05/E dated 17.04.2007 and the consequential order
Na.Ka.No.1082/2005/E dated 25.04.2007 and quash the same and
further direct the respondents to pay the subsistence allowance
to the petitioner as per Fundamental Rules.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamadevan
For Respondents : Mr.S.K.Bose
ORDER
Mr.S.Kamadevan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, despite his best efforts taken more than three or four occasions, he could not contact the petitioner and as to whether, still having anything to pursue this writ petition or not, is not known to the counsel, hence, the learned counsel reported 'no instruction' before this Court.
2.Heard Mr.S.K.Bose, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, who would submit that, because of the pendency of the writ petition, no further proceedings have been issued pursuant to the impugned orders.
1/2
3.Recording the said submission made by both sides, since no instructions have been given long time by the petitioner, this writ petition can be disposed of as 'no instructions', accordingly it is dismissed as no instruction received from the petitioner, as reported by the learned counsel. No costs.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
Sgl
To
1.The Chief Executive Officer,
Tamilnadu Khadi and Village Industries Board,
Kuralagam, Chennai 108.
2.The Assistant Director
of Khadi & Village Industries,
Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
W.P.No.20291 of 2007
AJS(CO)
NRA(04/02/2021)
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Chinnakannu
The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Khadi and Village Industries Board
The Assistant Director of Khadi & Village Industries
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
