Disposed

N.Senthilkumar v. Secretary to Government

Madras HC22 Apr 2021WP/20215/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This disposal of W.P.No.20215 of 2020 concerns a petitioner who apprehended that construction of irrigation project would cause irreparable prejudice to downstream agriculturists. The court clarified that regular channel will not be shut down completely.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner absolved further proceedings on the basis of State's representation regarding limited temporary shutdown of regular channel.

N.Senthilkumar Vs Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.04.2021 CORAM :

¶2

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶3

AND

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.20215 of 2020

¶5

N.Senthilkumar

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

Vs 1 The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Public Works Department Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2 The Chief Engineer Water Resources Organization/ Public Works Department Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3 The Superintending Engineer Water Resources Organization Bhavani Plan Formulation Circle Erode – 11. 4 The Executive Engineer Water Resources Organization Lower-Bhavani Plan Formulation Circle Erode. 5 The District Collector Erode District Erode. .. Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Tender notification in No.10/2020-21, Pa.Va.Va/ERODE/ dated 13.11.2020 on the file of the 3^rd respondent and quash the same in so far as the work in item No.5 is concerned; consequently direct the respondents to revise the Tender Notification after getting the views of the farmers as to the release of Water for irrigation.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Neelakandan

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

For Respondents

¶12

: Ms.R.J.Radhika Government Advocate

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶15

The matter pertains to the construction of a new irrigation project and the closure of the regular channel in such regard.

¶16

The grievance of the petitioner was recorded in an order of March 11, 2021. The petitioner apprehended that if the project was to be completed over a period of 24 months and the regular channel was shut down for two years, it would cause irreparable prejudice to the downstream agriculturists who have no other source of water.

¶17

It has now been clarified by the State and the respondent authorities that the regular channel will be shut down only for limited periods as indicated and not for the entire duration of 24 months, which is the time to be taken for completion of the irrigation project.

¶18

In the light of the stand taken by the State that the regular channel will not be shut down altogether for a continuous period of 24 months, the petitioner's apprehension has been allayed. The petitioner says that no further measures may be necessary if the official respondents adhere to the representation that the regular channel will not be shut down except for limited periods.

¶19

Accordingly, W.P.No.20215 of 2020 is disposed of on the basis of the State's representation that the regular channel serving the petitioner and other downstream agriculturists will not be shut down completely during the time taken for construction of the new irrigation project, but such regular channel may be shut for limited temporary periods when absolutely unavoidable.

¶20

There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.24989 and 24990 of 2020 are closed.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

sasi

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

To:

¶27

1 The Secretary to Government
Government of Tamil Nadu
Public Works Department
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
2 The Chief Engineer
Water Resources Organization/
Public Works Department
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
3 The Superintending Engineer
Water Resources Organization
Bhavani Plan Formulation Circle
Erode – 11.
4 The Executive Engineer
Water Resources Organization
Lower-Bhavani Plan Formulation Circle
Erode.
5 The District Collector
Erode District
Erode.
W.P.No.20215 of 2020
UM(CO)
baf 07/05/2021

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Senthilkumar v. Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Senthilkumar v. Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Vip Grand Properties Vs M/s.Canara Bank

K.Rajendran Vs The Chief Secretary

N.S.Subramaniyan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Gem Edible Oil Pvt. Ltd. Vs Adm International Sarl and 2 Others

Sunraja Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Adm International Sarl and 2 Others

Rajiv Rai Vs The presiding Officer