Disposed

K.Anbumani v. The District Collector

Madras HC24 Sept 2021WP/20170/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Madras, in a writ petition for mandamus regarding encroachments, issued notice to the retrospective respondent authorities to dispose of the matter on merits within three months and communicated no opinion on merits. Petition disposed with no order on costs.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to represent to Joint Commissioner, Animal Husbandry within two weeks for disposal of the representation within three months.

K.Anbumani Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 24.09.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶7

W.P.NO.20170 OF 2021

¶8

K.Anbumani .. Petitioner

¶9

..Vs..

¶10

The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Dharmapuri District 636 705.

¶11

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District 636 701.

¶12

The Tahsildar, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District 635 111. 4. Govindasamy 5. Mayakannan

¶13

Chinnasamy

¶14

Devaraj .. Respondents

¶15

Prayer:

¶16

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action and remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 7 in S.Nos.251 and 284 situated at Nariyanahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.09.2020.

¶17

For the Petitioner : Mr.K.Balu For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for respondents 1 to 3

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.)

¶21

Mr.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader, takes

¶22

notice for respondents 1 to 3 and informs that the competent authority to deal with the representation made by the petitioner is the Joint Director, Animal Husbandry, Dharmapuri District.

¶23

In view of the same, the petitioner shall carry a

¶24

representation to the Joint Commissioner, Animal Husbandry, Dharmapuri District, within a period of two weeks from date and the said authority on receipt of the representation shall deal with the same on merits and in accordance with law, and after following the prescribed procedure and hearing the parties concerned, shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the decision taken to all parties concerned, under acknowledgment, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation. No view is expressed herein as regards the merits of or tenability of the petitioner's representation.

¶25

W.P.No.20170 of 2021 is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

tar

¶31

To:

¶32

The District Collector, Collectorate Office,

¶33

Dharmapuri District 636 705.

¶34

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri,

¶35

Dharmapuri District 636 701.

¶36

The Tahsildar,

¶37

Karimangalam Taluk,

¶38

Dharmapuri District 635 111.

W.P.No.20170 of 2021

GMR(CO)

CS/29/09/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Anbumani v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Anbumani v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Rangasamy Vs The High Court of Madras

S.Janaki Raman Vs The General Manager

S.Durairaj Vs The Registrar (General)

Father of the Constitution of India - Foundation Vs The Secretary to Government

M.Vadivel Vs The Additional Chief secretary to the Government

Prabakar Vs the Authorized Officer