A.Kesavan @ Saravanan v. The Regiional Transport
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition for mandamus to renew license was dismissed for the petitioner's non-prosecution as no one appeared on the listing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 25.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.NO.20159 OF 2018
A.Kesavan @ Saravanan
Vs.
The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram District.
... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to renew the petitioner's license with his name as Kesavan @ Saravanan and his father's name as Arumugam @ Ramadoss.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on the last occasion on 23.11.2021, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed on 25.11.2021 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today (i.e. 25.11.2021), no one appeared for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not at all interested in prosecuting the case.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pns
To
The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.61973
W.P.No.20159 of 2018
KSM(CO) RLP(14/12/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Kesavan @ Saravanan
The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Maduranthagam, Kanchipuram District
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court