R.Arunachalam v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought a writ of mandate for a correlation certificate regarding his property. The court found that the certificate was already issued post-filing. The petition was closed with no costs as the relief had been achieved.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; petition closed post-issuance of the sought certificate.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P. No.1952 of 2021
R.Arunachalam ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Collector,
Chennai District.
2.The Tahsildar
Sholinganallur Taluk & Town,
Chennai.
3.The Head Surveyor,
Sholinganallur Taluk Office,
Sholinganallur, Chennai – 600 119.
4.The Taluk Surveyor,
Madipakkam Village Part – I,
Sholinganallur Taluk Office,
Sholinganallur, Chennai – 600 119. ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to issue correlation certificate in respect the petitioner's property Old Survey Number i.e., UDR Survey Nos.65, 65/2 & 65/4 and New Survey Nos.65/16, 65/17 and 65/18 and the subsequent sub-division Survey No.65/16C2 are all one among the same in respect of his property plot No.3 to an extent of 1250 square feet, situated at Sivasubramaniam Street, Ramalinga Nagar, Madipakkam, Chennai – 600 091, by considering the petitioner's representation/application dated 04.12.2020.
This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents Nos.2 to 4 to issue correlation certificate in respect the petitioner's property bearing old Survey Number i.e., UDR Survey Nos.65, 65/2 & 65/4 and New Survey Nos.65/16, 65/17 and 65/18 and the subsequent sub-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Arunachalam
- respondent
The District Collector, Chennai District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk & Town, Chennai
- respondent
The Head Surveyor, Sholinganallur Taluk Office, Chennai
- respondent
The Taluk Surveyor, Madipakkam Village Part I, Chennai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court