Disposed

S.Susheela v. The Director of Elementary Education

Madras HC14 Sept 2021WP/19352/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandatory writ to direct the Director of Elementary Education to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2021 and transfer her to a Non-minority school post within a fixed timeframe.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2021 and dispose of it on merits within six weeks.

S.Susheela Vs The Director of Elementary Education — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.NO.19352 OF 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶7

S.Susheela ... Petitioner

¶8

.Vs.

¶9

The Director of Elementary Education,

¶10

DPI Campus, College Road,

¶11

Chennai – 600 006.

¶12

The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

¶13

The District Educational Officer,

¶14

Avadi Educational District, Thiruvallur District.

¶15

The Block Educational Officer, Poonammallee Block, Thiruvallur District.

¶16

The Correspondent, Annai Lourdu Primary School, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Poonamallee Union,

¶17

Chennai – 600 072 ... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER:-

¶19

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pass orders for transferring the petitioner in any vacancies or need post in Non-minority schools in Villivakkam Union or Poonamallee Union, by considering the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 21.01.2021 with all consequential and other attendant benefits within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Shankaran For Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal

¶23

Government Advocate

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Government Advocate submitted that appropriate orders will be passed on the representation dated 21.01.2021 of the petitioner.

¶26

Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed by directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the representation dated 21.01.2021 of the petitioner and dispose the same in accordance with law and on merits within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

jas/rgm

¶31

¶32

The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶33

The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

¶34

The District Educational Officer, Avadi Educational District, Thiruvallur District.

¶35

The Block Educational Officer, Poonammallee Block,

¶36

Thiruvallur District.

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

The Correspondent, Annai Lourdu Primary School, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Poonamallee Union, Chennai – 600 072. +1cc to Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan, Advocate, S.R.No.46646 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.46863

¶39

W.P.NO.19352 OF 2021

¶40

KK(CO) PBS/28/09/2021

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Susheela v. The Director of Elementary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Susheela v. The Director of Elementary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Dharmalingam Vs The Director

S. Subramani, Vs D.Kamalakkannan

C.Rajendiran Vs The Managing Director

M.Kalpana Mahalingam Vs The Secretary

G.Murugan, (Mhr 607) Vs The Managing Director

M.Mallika Vs The State of Tamil Nadu