K.Ramu, v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras issued a writ of Mandamus directing the Tahsildar to survey and sub-divide the petitioner's agricultural land within six weeks, considering a representation dated 20.06.2013.
What did the court decide?
Direction to survey the subject land and sub-divide the same within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
What the court decided
K. Ramu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 28.10.2021 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.1910 of 2014
.... Petitioner
Vs
The Tahsildar, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District.
.... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.06.2013 seeking the respondent to sub-divide the petitioner's property situated at No.51, Neivilakku Village, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District bearing Survey No.393/4 admeasuring to an extent of 54 2/3 cents within the time frame to be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr. M.R.Gokul Krishnan Government Advocate
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.06.2013.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent is directed to survey and sub-divide the petitioner's property situated at No.51, Neivilakku Village, Vedaranyam Taluk.
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 226 should be allowed to direct the respondent to sub-divide the petitioner's property.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramu
- respondent
Tahsildar, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District
Coram
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court