Disposed

K.Gandhi v. The Joint Registrar of cooperative societies

Madras HC8 Sept 2021WP/18847/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing the Joint Registrar and Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies to act against the 4th respondent, whose appointment was allegedly secured via forged documents. The court directed the 1st and 2nd respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation by hearing the 4th respondent within six weeks, adhering to natural justice principles.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 1 and 2 directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation within six weeks after hearing the 4th respondent and complying with principles of natural justice.

K.Gandhi Vs The Joint Registrar of cooperative societies — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.09.2021

¶3

 CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

 W.P.No.18847 of 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶7

K.Gandhi

¶8

 ...Petitioner

¶9

Vs

¶10

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies,

¶11

District Collector Office Campus, Salem.

¶12

2.The Assistant Registrar,

¶13

Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherry Road, Salem.

¶14

3.The President,

¶15

 No.341, Kuralnatham Co-operative Bank Ltd,
 Kuralnatham, Salem – 636 204.

¶16

4.S.Palanivelu

¶17

 ...Respondents

¶18

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1
to 3 to take appropriate legal action against the 4th respondent
secured appointment based on forged documents, by considering
the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 03.03.2021.

¶19

For Petitioner:Mr.G.Sankaran

¶20

For Respondents:Mr.V.P.R.Elamparithi,
Government Advocate for R1 & R2

¶21

Mr.Gokula Krishnan
Standing Counsel for R3

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Advocate for the 1st and 2nd respondents and
learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2.This writ petition is disposed by directing the 1^st and

¶26

2^nd respondents to dispose the representation of the petitioner after hearing due notice to the 4^th respondent. It is made clear that order shall be passed by the following principles of natural justice by giving adequate opportunity to the 4^th respondent and also to respond the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)

¶29

// True Copy //

¶30

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶31

jas

¶32

To

¶33

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, District Collector Office Campus, Salem.

¶34

2.The Assistant Registrar,

¶35

Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cherry Road, Salem.

¶36

3.The President,

¶37

No.341, Kuralnatham Co-operative Bank Ltd, Kuralnatham, Salem – 636 204.

¶38

+1cc to M/s.G.Sankaran, Advocate SR.No.46036

¶39

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.No.46126

¶40

 W.P.No.18847 of 2021

¶41

KSM(CO)

¶42

RVM(24/09/2021)

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Gandhi v. The Joint Registrar of cooperative societies

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Gandhi v. The Joint Registrar of cooperative societies

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Murugesan (Staff No. CR2401) Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd.

T.E.Sekaran Vs The Tahsildhar

K.E.Moorthy Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

S.Anjalatchi Ammal Vs The State Rep. by

The General Secretary Vs The Chief General / Oic

Estate of Late T.P.Ramaswamy Pillai Vs Special Deputy Collector