Remanded

V.Shanmugasundaram v. The Managing Director

Madras HC7 Sept 2021WP/18832/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Madras High Court disposed of this writ petition seeking interest for belated retirement benefits. Relying on a subsequent order (W.P. No. 506 of 2021) that reduced rates due to the pandemic, the court directed the Transport Corporation to pay interest at 4% per annum in six monthly instalments.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to pay interest at 4% per annum for belated payment of pension and retirement benefits by way of six equated monthly instalments.

V.Shanmugasundaram Vs The Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.18832 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 (Through Video Conferencing)

1.V.Shanmugasundaram

2.M.Arumugam

3.D.Udhayakumar

4.K.Karivaratharajan ... Petitioners

¶10

¶11

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 43.

¶12

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Erode Region, Chennimalai Road, Erode – 638 001.

¶13

The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation EPF Trust, Thirvalluvar House, Anna Salai, Chennai – 2. ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest for the belated payment of Provident Fund, Gratuity, Encashment of Earned Leave and Commuted Value of Pension, at the rate of 12% per annum.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.C.S.K.Sathish Standing Counsel

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Though this writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the belated payment of the petitioners Provident Fund, Gratuity, Encashment of Earned Leave and Commuted Value of Pension, in terms of the decision of this Court in W.P.No.15886 of 2020 vide order dated 19.01.2021, it is noticed that this view has been subsequently modified in W.P.No.506 of 2021 vide order dated 24.03.2021 considering the constraints of the State Finance due out break of Covid-19 Pandemic with the following observations:-

¶19

“(i) Respondent/Transport Corporation is directed to pay interest @ 4% per annum to the Petitioner for the belated payment of gratuity, leave salary and communication of pension amount that are yet to be settled, in six equal monthly instalments, commencing 01.04.2021.

¶20

(ii) In case of delay in making instalments within the time stipulated supra, with reference to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court (supra), interest payable for the period of delay shall be at 6% per annum.”

¶21

Considering the same, this Writ Petition is disposed by directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 4% per annum to the petitioners for the belated payment of Provident Fund, Gratuity, Encashment of Earned Leave etc., within a period of six months in six equated monthly instalments.

¶22

This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

arb

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

¶30

The Managing Director,

¶31

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 43.

¶32

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Erode Region, Chennimalai Road,

¶33

Erode – 638 001.

¶34

The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation EPF Trust, Thirvalluvar House,

¶35

Anna Salai, Chennai – 2.

¶36

+4ccs to Mr.N.Senthil Kumar, Advocate Sr No.45327

¶37

W.P.No.18832 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.20135 of 2021

¶38

RLD (CO) PR (24/09/2021)

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Shanmugasundaram v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Shanmugasundaram v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Gnanasekaran Vs The Managing Director

A. Mohan Vs The Managing Director

C.Tamilarasan Vs Tamil Nadu Uniform Services Recruitment Board

N.Murugesan (Staff No. CR2401) Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd.

T.E.Sekaran Vs The Tahsildhar

K.E.Moorthy Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu