the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the suit property and the same is to be maintained. Pursuant to the disposal of O.S.No.207 of 2009, the petitioner filed O.S.No.58 of 2013 on the file of the District Court, Chengalpet, against the 2nd respondent seeking for declaration of petitioner title and the sale deed dated 13.05.1991 registered as Document No.1908 of 1991 in SRO, Pallavaram, in not valid and binding upon the petitioner, for permanent injunction; and other reliefs. In this suit, the 2nd Respondent has entered appearance before the Trial Court and was contesting the suit in O.S.No.58 of 2013. In the meanwhile, the 2nd respondent filed an application in I.A.No.280 of 2014 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking to reject the plaint. However, after contest, the same was dismissed on 05.09.2017. It was confirmed by the this Court, vide order dated 09.10.2020 passed in CRP No.2691 of 2018. Now, the suit in O.S.No.58 of 2013 stands adjourned to 20.09.2021, for trial. When the matter stood thus, the petitioner understand that the 2nd respondent, unmindful of the pendency of O.S.No.58 of 2013, has filed an application/representation to the District Collector, Chengalpet District, seeking patta in his name in respect of the said property on the strength of the fraudulent sale deed dated 13.05.1991, registered as Document No.1908/ of 1991 on the file of the SRO Pallawaram, on the basis of which, the 1s respondent has issued the impugned notice dated 06.08.2021 calling upon the petitioner, the 2nd respondent and others, to attend an enquiry on 26.08.2021 in connection with the 2 respondent's representation seeking Patta transfer in his name. Apparently, the 2nd respondent, in his representation, has suppressed the pendency of O.S.No.58 of 2013 on the file of the District Court, Chengalpet.
