Disposed

G.Ramalingam v. The District Education Officer

Madras HC5 Jan 2021WP/18093/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner sought a School Transfer Certificate with the correct father's name as mentioned erroneously as the grandfather. The High Court granted the petitioner two weeks to submit a fresh representation with supporting documents to the competent authority.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted two weeks to submit a fresh representation to the competent authority with supporting documents to correct the error in the School Register.

G.Ramalingam Vs The District Education Officer — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.01.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶5

W.P.No.18093 of 2020

¶6

G.Ramalingam ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The District Education Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶9

2.The Dharmapuri Municipality Primary School, Rep.by its Head Master, Ambalathadi, Town Hall Street, Dharmapuri – 636 701.

¶10

3.The Block Educational Officer Dharmapuri District ...Respondents (R3 Suo motu impleaded vide order dated 05.01.2021 made in W.P.No.18093/2020)

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue the School Transfer Certificate by rectifying the error in the petitioner father's name by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.11.2020.

¶12

For Petitioner: Mr.R.S.Maitreya For Respondents: Mrs.P.Kavitha

¶13

Government Advocate

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The grievance of the petitioner is that his father name in the School Transfer Certificate has been mistakenly mentioned with the name of the Grandfather and it needs to be corrected.

¶16

Mrs.P.Kavitha, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner ought to have enclosed a representation along with the certificate obtained from the Village Administrative Officer and therefore, it is yet to be considered. The petitioner has also obtained the required certificate from the Village Administrative Officer but has not

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

made any representation therefore, the petitioner is permitted to submit another representation along with the certificate issued by the respective Village Administrative Officer and other relevant records to establish the name of the petitioner's father as Guruvan, within a period of two weeks.

¶19

The learned Government Advocate has also submitted that the petitioner has not made any representation to the Block Educational Officer, who is the Competent Authority and also not made as a party in this writ petition.

¶20

In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, the Block Educational Officer, Dharmapuri District is suo motu impleaded as third respondent in this writ petition and Mrs.P.Kavitha, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the newly impleaded respondent.

¶21

Since the petitioner has not made any representation to the concerned authority, it is open to the petitioner to make out a fresh representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with the certificate issued by the Village Administrative Officer disclosing the name of the petitioner's father along with any other documents if any, are in possession of the petitioner to the Competent Authority namely, the Block Educational Officer, Dharmapuri, who is impleaded as third respondent. On receipt of such representation, the Block Educational Officer shall consider and correct the same in the School Register within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

6.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No

costs.

s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar Pns To

¶28

1.The District Education Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2.The Head Master, Dharmapuri Municipality Primary School, Ambalathadi,

¶31

Town Hall Street,

¶32

Dharmapuri – 636 701.

¶33

3.The Block Educational officer Dharmapuri District

¶34

+1 Cc to Mr.R.Jayaprakash, Advocate sr 635.

¶35

+1 CC to The Government Pleader sr 512.

¶36

W.P.No.18093 of 2020
RV(CO)
SP(21/01/2021)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Ramalingam v. The District Education Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ramalingam v. The District Education Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Psg College of Pharmacy, Vs The Pharmacy Council of India

S.Velayutham Vs The Chairman

Mr.Rangasamy Vs The Directorate of Technical Education

Mr.Manikandan.R. Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

A.Lazer Vs Inspector of Police

M/s.Sai Shilphaa Creators Vs The Deputy Chief Internal Audit Officer