Disposed

M/s.Joy Alukas India Pvt.Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Madras HC17 Dec 2021WP/17974/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging a TN VAT order, the Division Bench held the issue is covered by an earlier decision (W.P. 31767 of 2014). The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner within 30 days instead of quashing the order via writ, and returned the certified copy of the record.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file appeal before Appellate Commissioner within 30 days; writ petition disposed; original order returned to counsel.

M/s.Joy Alukas India Pvt.Ltd., Vs The Assistant… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.NO.17974 OF 2021 AND W.M.P.NO.19196 OF 2021

¶6

(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

¶7

M/s. Joy Alukas India Private Limited, Represented by its CFO, Tom Jose, Cross Cut Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore - 12. ... Petitioner

¶8

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Gandhipuram Circle, Coimbatore ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer:

¶10

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in TIN:33442182689/2009-2010 dated 28.06.2021 and to quash the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Inbarajan For Respondent : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Prima facie, it appears that the issue is now squarely covered against the petitioner in terms of the decision of this Court in W.P.No.31767 of 2014 vide order dated 06.01.2020.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue is pending before the Honourable Division Bench of this Court against the order passed in W.P.No.31767 of 2014 on 06.01.2020. The petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy before the Appellate Commissioner.

¶16

The petitioner is therefore directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner within a period of thirty(30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner may however request the Appellate Commissioner to await for further orders to be passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court.

¶17

Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order dated 28.06.2021 as requested by the learned counsel for the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006.

¶18

The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is also closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

rgm/nst

¶24

¶25

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Gandhipuram Circle, Coimbatore

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

Copy To

¶28

The Section Officer, English Record, High Court, Madras.

¶29

(To return the certified copy of the impugned order dated 28.06.2021 to the counsel for the petitioner)

¶30

+1cc to Mr.N.Inbarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.68084 +1cc to the Special Government Pleader(Taxes), S.R.No.68429

¶31

W.P.No.17974 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.19196 of 2021

¶32

NR(CO) PM/11/01/2022

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Joy Alukas India Pvt.Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Joy Alukas India Pvt.Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl.Yj.Cashew Industries Vs The commissioner

M/s.Bagya Trading Company Vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Greater Chennai Corporation

M/s.D.S.K.Electricals Vs The Senior Intelligence officer

M/s.Fortune Marketing Private Limited Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refunds-Ii)

Panda Garment Exports (India) Pvt.Ltd Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)