Allowed

R.S.Priya v. The Controller of Examination

Madras HC13 Jul 2021WP/17327/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner challenging non-issuance of a hall ticket for BDS final year examinations. The court held that since the State Level Scrutiny Committee recognized her community status, there was no legal impediment to publishing results, directing the university to do so within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

The University was directed to publish the final year BDS examination results within two weeks.

R.S.Priya Vs The Controller of Examination — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13.07.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶5

W.P.No.17327 of 2020 and WMP.No.21439 of 2020 & WMP.No.8692 of 2021

¶6

Selvi R.S.Priya

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

vs. 1. The Controller of Examinations, MGR Medical University, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.

¶9

The Principal, Adi Parasakthi Dental College, Melmaruvathur, ...Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue Hall Ticket to the petitioner to write the BDS Final Year Examinations in the Centre of Second Respondent College from 24.11.2020.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents : Mr.S.Wilson for R1 Mr.A.S.Balaji for R2

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner belongs to Hindu “Malakuravan” Community, which is a Scheduled Tribe Community and at the time of admission to BDS Course in the second respondent College, the petitioner did not produce the Community Certificate and in pursuant to the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.19306 of 2016 dated 07.06.2016, the petitioner was admitted in the first year BDS Course and she continued her studies in the second respondent college and appeared for the final year examination conducted by the first respondent University during November, 2020 and however, the first respondent University did not issue Hall Ticket to the petitioner to write the BDS final year examination and therefore, she has filed the present writ petition.

¶14

At the time of filing the writ petition, the State Level Scrutiny Committee has recognized the community status of the petitioner as Hindu “Malakuravan” Community which is a Scheduled

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Tribe Community and based on the aforesaid order passed by the State Level Scrutiny Committee, the petitioner was permitted to appear for the final year BDS Examination commencing from 21.11.2020 and in view of the interim order passed in this writ petition dated 23.11.2020, the results have not been published.

¶17

Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has also filed W.P.No.4885 of 2021 and vide order dated 09.03.2021, a Division Bench of this Court has directed the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi to consider the petitioner's representations/applications for issuance of Community Certificate within a period of eight weeks and as on date, no order has been passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi and as such, there is no legal impediment for the first respondent University to publish the results of the petitioner.

¶18

Mr.A.S.Balaji, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent college would submit that as per the terms and conditions of the selection order, writ petitioner has to produce the original Community Certificate to the second respondent college and so far the said Community Certificate has not been produced.

¶19

In view of the above submissions and in the light of the order passed by the State Level Scrutiny Committee, this Court is of the view that there is no legal embargo for the first respondent University to publish the results of the petitioner's final year BDS examination held during November 2020. Accordingly, this Court directs the first respondent University to publish the results of the petitioner's final year BDS examination held during November 2020, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Insofar the production of Community Certificate is concerned, it is made clear that the petitioner may produce the said Community Certificate in the event of receiving from the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi District.

¶20

With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

Jvm

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

To 1. The Controller of Examinations, MGR Medical University, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Principal, Adi Parasakthi Dental College, Melmaruvathur, +1CC to Mr.S.Wilson, Advocate, Sr.No.33137/21 W.P.No.17327 of 2020 JPL (CO) K.RK. (09.08.2021)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.S.Priya v. The Controller of Examination

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.S.Priya v. The Controller of Examination

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I.Siraj Ahamed Vs The Commissioner

P.Mahalakshmi Vs Tamilnadu Forest Department

K.Balasubramaniyam Vs The Principal secretary to Government

V.Vinoth Kumar Vs The University Grants Commission

Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetathipathi Vs The Chief Educational officer

B.Bhaskaran Vs The Collector