Dismissed

M/s.S.L.Lumax Limited v. The Additional Commissioner

Madras HC2 Nov 2021WP/16482/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

M/s. S.L. Lumax Limited withdrew the writ petition challenging a show cause notice under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court of Judicature at Madras allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Cancellation and dismissal of the writ petition and writ miscellaneous petitions on withdrawal of the plea.

M/s.S.L.Lumax Limited Vs The Additional… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 02.11.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

W.P.No.16482 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.17449 & 17450 of 2021

¶6

M/s.S.L.Lumax Limited,

¶7

Represented by its Chief Financial Officer, Mr.R.Murali,

¶8

Plot No.G-15, SIPCOT Industrial Park, Irungattukottai, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram 602 117. ... Petitioner -Vs.-

¶9

The Additional Commissioner,

¶10

Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai IV Commissionerate, MHU Complex, 692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

¶11

Deputy Commissioner, Irungattukottai Division, C-48, II Floor, T.N.H.B Building, 2^nd Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. .. Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned show cause notice No.73/2011-12 bearing Ref.C.No.V/15/85/09/2012-Cx.Adj.IV dated 27.02.2012 of the 1^st respondent and to quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Sankareshwaran For Respondent : Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior standing counsel

¶14

Captioned matter is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR WITHDRAWAL' at the instance of learned counsel on record for writ petitioner today.

¶15

Learned counsel on record for writ petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file which reads as follows:

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Therefore, captioned Writ Petition and Writ Miscellaneous Petitions therein are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

nsa/mk

¶23

¶24

The Additional Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai IV Commissionerate, MHU Complex, 692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

¶25

Deputy Commissioner, Irungattukottai Division, C-48, II Floor, T.N.H.B Building, 2^nd Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040.

¶26

+1cc to M/s.R.Anishkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.57111

¶27

+1cc to M/s.T.Pramod Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.57234

¶28

W.P.No.16482 of 2021

¶29

and W.M.P.Nos.17450 & 17449 of 2021

¶30

KSM(CO)

¶31

SB(23/11/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.S.L.Lumax Limited v. The Additional Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.S.L.Lumax Limited v. The Additional Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cri Pumps Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Assistant Commissioner(St) (Fac)

AA.189 Ingur Primary Agricultural Vs the Income Tax Officer

Patrician College of Arts and Science Vs Chennai Metropolitan Water supply and Sewerage Board

Vaidyanathan.R Vs the Dist.Collector

Kannan.R Vs the Dist.Collector

M/S the Ramco Cements Ltd., Vs the Asst. Commissioner of