P.Vijayakumar v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the petitioner filed an endorsement stating he was not pressing the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.No.16257 of 2020
P.Vijayakumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Tahsildar,
Mettupalayam Taluk Office, Sirumugai Road, Mattupalayam-641 301 Coimbatore District.
- The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyanaickkenpalayam, Coimbatore District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner herein dated 28.08.2020 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to remove the lock and seal order dated 21.08.2020 in Na.Ka.No.2113/2020/A7 thereby restoring the possession of the property to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Vijayakumar
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Mettupalayam Taluk Office
- respondent
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyanaickkenpalayam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court