Dismissed

M/S. Lakshmi Mills Vs

Madras HC18 Jun 2021WP/15821/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice S.M. Subramaniam permitted the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 under Article 226. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with no costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

M/S. Lakshmi Mills Vs — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.06.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.15821 of 2006

¶6

M/s.Lakshmi Mills, Rep., by its Partner, Mr.T.Sridhar, 3/248, Muthukalipatti Village, Namakkal District. .. Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Chennai-600 009.

¶9

2.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep., by its Chairman, 800, Anna Salai.

¶10

3.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, The Superintending Engineer, Salem Electricity Distribution Circle-Salem, Salem. .. Respondents

¶11

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Declaration declaring the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 12 of 2003) as ultra vires the Constitution of India, illegal and unenforceable relating to levy of tax on the sale of electricity by the respondents to the petitioner (H.T.S.No.213).

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For R1 : Mr.V.Nanmaran, Government Advocate For RR 2 & 3 : No appearance ****** ORDER

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, through video conferencing, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

abr

¶21

¶22

1.The Secretary to Government,

¶23

The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶24

Energy Department, Chennai-600 009.

¶25

2.The Chairman,

¶26

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

¶27

800, Anna Salai.

¶28

3.The Superintending Engineer,

¶29

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Salem Electricity Distribution Circle-Salem, Salem.

¶30

W.P.No.15821 of 2006

¶31

PL(CO) CB(23/07/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Lakshmi Mills Vs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Lakshmi Mills Vs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Vijayalatha and Co., Vs Union of India

M/S Amruthajyothi Finance Vs Union of India

M/S.Reliance Communications Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Mrs.C.Anitha, Vs Income Tax Officer

Schneider Electric Systems India Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Secretariat

K.Sivakumar Vs The Commissioner (I/c)