A writ petition seeking a directive to list a specific criminal appeal was dismissed as the petition was deemed misconceived. The court refused to compel the listing of the appeal before the relevant court.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.15584 of 2021
V.Subramanian ...Petitioner
Vs.
The Honourable Registrar General High Court Chennai 104.
...Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to list the appeal in C.A.No.649/2011 before this Honourable Court and hear the same.
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
This writ petition is utterly misconceived as it seeks a direction for a criminal appeal to be taken up by the relevant court.
s/dAssistant Registrar(CS VII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
sra
To:
The Registrar General High Court Chennai 104.
+1 CC to Mr.D.Rajagopal, Advocate, Sr 36333.
W.P.No.15584 of 2021
JPL(CO) LS(02/08/2021)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent to list the criminal appeal before the court.
Whether the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of Writ of Mandamus is maintainable in the present circumstances.
V.Subramanian
The Honourable Registrar General High Court Chennai 104
Sanjib Banerjee
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
