Dismissed

J.K.Krishnamurthy v. The Additional Chief Secretary

Madras HC30 Mar 2021WP/1399/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed this writ petition via mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within the court-framed time limit. The court recorded that the appeal has already been disposed of and granted the prayer by directing service of the order.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed; the respondents were directed to serve the petitioner with the order disposing the underlying appeal dated 25.02.2021.

J.K.Krishnamurthy Vs The Additional… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 30.03.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P. No.1399 of 2021

¶5

and

¶6

WMP. No.1574 of 2021

¶7

J.K.Krishnamurthy …Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Additional Cheif Secretary to Government,

¶10

Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -9.

¶11

2.The Commissioner,

¶12

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam,

¶13

Chennai - 600 034.

¶14

3.The Joint Commissioner,

¶15

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Behind Bus Stand, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶16

4.The Assistant Commissioner,

¶17

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Cuddalore Taluk & District - 607 001.

¶18

5.The Executive Officer,

¶19

A/M. Rajagopalaswami Thirukoil,

¶20

Pudupalayam, Cuddalore Taluk & District - 607 001.

¶21

...Respondents

¶22

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ Mandamus, to direct the 1^st respondent to dispose of petitioner's appeal dated 11.09.2020 within the time framed by this Court.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gandhi Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesh,

¶24

Government Advocate R1 to R4 No Appearance for R5.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

ORDER

¶27

Mr.R.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate for the respondents states that the appeal filed by the petitioner on 11.09.2020 has been disposed by order dated 25.02.2021. A copy of the same be placed on file. Let the orders be served upon the petitioner to enable him to take such steps, if he so desires, in relation to the same. With this, the Mandamus sought is achieved.

¶28

Recording the aforesaid, this writ petition is closed. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar (CS VII)

¶31

/TRUE COPY/

¶32

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶33

rkp

¶34

¶35

1.The Additional Cheif Secretary to Government,

¶36

Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -9.

¶37

2.The Commissioner,

¶38

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam,

¶39

Chennai - 600 034.

¶40

3.The Joint Commissioner,

¶41

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Behind Bus Stand, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶42

4.The Assistant Commissioner,

¶43

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Cuddalore Taluk & District - 607 001.

¶44

5.The Executive Officer,

¶45

A/M. Rajagopalaswami Thirukoil,

¶46

Pudupalayam, Cuddalore Taluk & District - 607 001.

¶47

+1CC TO M/S.SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.NO. 21283

¶48

W.P. No.1399 of 2021 and WMP. No.1574 of 2021

¶49

PL(CO) KKN 27.04.2021

¶50

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.K.Krishnamurthy v. The Additional Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.K.Krishnamurthy v. The Additional Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Globe Fresh, Vs The Deputy Commissioner of

Azeem Basha, Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

M/s.Sham Interiors Vs The Assistant Commercial Tax officer

V.T.Arun Thomas Vs The Designated Authority under Dtvsv Scheme/

P.Panchalai Vs The Commissioner

Shri Rajagopal Kamaraj Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income tax