Disposed

V.B.Gopi v. The Revenue Divisional officer

Madras HC23 Jun 2021WP/13085/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of the petitioner's appeal regarding the cancellation of a patta issued to the sixth respondent within twelve weeks. Notice to the sixth respondent was dispensed with as the order would not prejudice their interest. The writ petition has been dismissed thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within twelve weeks.

V.B.Gopi Vs The Revenue Divisional officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 23.06.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Writ Petition No.13085 of 2021

¶6

V.B.Gopi ... Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur. 2 The Thasildar, Thiruvallur Taluk office, Thiruvallur. 3 The Revenue Inspector, Thiruvallur Taluk office, Thiruvallur.

¶9

4 The Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvallur City, Thiruvallur. 5 The Town Sub Inspector, Thiruvallur Municipality Office, Thiruvallur.

¶10

6 Tmt. Agilandam ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal dated on 29.01.2021 made by the petitioner to cancel the patta issued in favour of sixth respondent within a time frame.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravana Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Government Advocate for R1 to R5

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶15

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction directing the 1^st respondent to dispose the petitioner's appeal

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

dated 29.01.2021 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

¶18

In view of the order is going to be passed in the present Writ Petition, which will not prejudice the interest of the 6^th respondent, notice to the 6^th respondent is dispensed with.

¶19

The grievance of the petitioner is that against the order of granting patta in favour of 6^th respondent, the petitioner said to have filed an appeal before the 1^st respondent Revenue Divisional Officer on 29.01.2021. After admitting appeal, so far, the appeal was not disposed of and no order has been passed on it. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the limited prayer sought in the Writ Petition, without going into the merits of case, the 1^st respondent Revenue Divisional Officer is directed to consider the petitioner's appeal and pass suitable orders on merits in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner as well as 6^th respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

rpp

¶26

¶27

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur.

¶28

2.The Thasildar, Thiruvallur Taluk office, Thiruvallur.

¶29

3.The Revenue Inspector, Thiruvallur Taluk office, Thiruvallur.

¶30

4.The Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvallur City, Thiruvallur.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

5.The Town Sub Inspector, Thiruvallur Municipality Office, Thiruvallur.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.M.Saravana Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.29248

¶34

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.29175

¶35

W.P.No.13085 of 2021

¶36

PCH(CO) CB(23/07/2021)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.B.Gopi v. The Revenue Divisional officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.B.Gopi v. The Revenue Divisional officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendran Vs The District Collector

N.Murugan Vs The District Collector

R.Raniya Vs The Inspector General of Registration

A.Chinnamuthu Vs The Tahsildar

Raja Vs the State Rep.by Its

Karunaiyammal Vs The Inspector General of Registration