Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

D.Elumalai Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

Home
Madras HC
2021
D.Elumalai Vs The District CollectorD.Elumalai v. The District Collector

Disposed

D.Elumalai v. The District Collector

Madras HC16 Jun 2021WP/12723/2021

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

W.P.No.12723 of 2021

D.Elumalai, S/o. Duraisamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Villupuram,

Villupuram District.

The Assistant Director of Land

Survey, Land Records Department, District Collector Campus,

Villupuram, Villupuram Dt.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
D. Elumalai
respondent
The District Collector
respondent
The Assistant Director of Land Survey
respondent
The Tahsildar

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 16 Jun 2021 · June
Registered: 14 Jun 2021
Case no.: WP/12723/2021

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V. Bharathidasan

D.Karunakaran Vs The Inspector General of Registration
15 Jun 2021
V.Sekar Vs The Chief Secretary
14 Jun 2021
Ajay Vs the State Rep. by
14 Jun 2021
Mr. P. Abdhul Hahim Vs The Inspector General of Registration
16 Jun 2021

Cite this judgement

D.Elumalai v. The District Collector, WP/12723/2021 (MAD), decided on 16 June 2021.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V. BHARATHIDASAN

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

The Tahsildar,

O/o. The Tahsildar,

Melmalaiyanur Taluk,

Villupuram Dt.

... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to make an enquiry on the petitioner representation and to issue patta to the land bearing Survey No.191/4B to an extent of 0.2 ¾ cent out whole extent of 0.54 cents at Seruthalaipoondi Village, Melmalaiyanur Taluk, Villupuram District, by considering and disposing of the petitioner's representation dated 17.09.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajkumar

For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Government Advocate

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference)

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction directing the respondents to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 17.09.2018 and to issue patta to the land bearing Survey No.191/4B situated at Seruthalaipoondi Village, Melmalaiyanur Taluk, Villupuram District in his favour.

The grievance of the petitioner is that, by means of family partition, the petitioner and other co-owners partitioned certain properties. Thereafter, the petitioner has made an application before the 3^rd respondent Tahsildar on 17.09.2018 seeking for a separate patta and subsequently, he has also approached the 3^rd respondent regularly. But, so far, his application was not considered and no order has been passed on it. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.

Considering the limited prayer sought in the Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the case, the 3^rd respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's application and pass suitable orders on merits in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner as well as other interested parties, if any within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

rpp To

The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

The Assistant Director of Land Survey, Land Records Department, District Collector Campus, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Tahsildar, O/o. The Tahsildar, Melmalaiyanur Taluk, Villupuram District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.28448

+1cc to Mr.X.Selvam Sounder, Advocate Sr.28042

W.P.No.12723 of 2021

sr-II[co] srg 16/07/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. BHARATHIDASAN

CNR

HCMA010101982021

Topic

Pension and Retirement Benefits

Bench

V. Bharathidasan

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

Tmt. Rajammal Vs The District Revenue Officer

16 Jun 2021

A.Meera Vs The District Registrar

16 Jun 2021