Disposed

B.Veeralakshmi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC3 Dec 2021WP/12501/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of a writ petition challenging the inadmissibility of Open Schooling candidates for B.N.Y.S. admission. The petition was rendered infructuous as admission had already been granted and the petitioner was pursuing the course.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed as infructuous due to grant of admission; liberty to challenge future adverse orders.

B.Veeralakshmi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.12.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,

¶5

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

W.P.No.12501 of 2021

B.Veeralakshmi

..Petitioner

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶13

The Selection Committee, Directorate of Indian Medicine and Homeopathy, Arignar Anna Govt. Hospital of Indian Medicine Campus (AAGHIM), Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106.

¶14

The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Represented by its Registrar, No. 69, Anna Salai Road, Guindy,Chennai - 600 032.

¶15

JSS College Naturopathy and Yogic Science, Palakkad Highway, Navakarai, Coimbatore - 641 105. ..Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of declaration declaring that Clause 5 of the Prospectus for admission to B.N.Y.S. Medical Degree Course (Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Science) issued by the 2^nd Respondent for the session 2020-2021 is illegal insofar as it holds that the candidates who have passed through Open Schooling are not eligible to apply for B.N.Y.S. Medical Degree Course and consequently forbear the 2^nd Respondent from cancelling the admission having Ref.No.A.R.No.1305, dated 25.02.2021 of the Petitioner for B.N.Y.S. Medical Degree for the Course Session 2020-2021.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

For the Petitioner

¶19

: Mrs. Nalini Chindambaram, Senior Counsel for M/s.C.Uma

¶20

For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. P.Muthukumar, Government Pleader

¶21

For the Respondent 3 : Mr. S.Wilson

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the writ petition, admission has been given to the petitioner and she is pursuing the course in question based on the eligibility certificate issued by Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University.

¶25

In view of the above, we find that the prayer made in the writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case any adverse order is passed in future, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge it afresh.

¶26

W.M.P.Nos. 13271 to 13273 of 2021 are closed. There will be

¶27

no orders as to costs.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶30

//True Copy//

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶32

vjt

¶33

To:

¶34

The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Health and Family Welfare Department,

¶35

Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶36

The Chairman,

¶37

Selection Committee, Directorate of Indian Medicine and Homeopathy,

¶38

Arignar Anna Govt. Hospital of

¶39

Indian Medicine Campus (AAGHIM), Arumbakkam,Chennai - 600 106.

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, No. 69, Anna Salai Road, Guindy,Chennai - 600 032.

¶42

+1cc to M/s.C.Uma, Advocate, S.R.No.63863

¶43

W.P.No.12501 of 2021

¶44

RP(CO) RGA(09/12/2021)

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Veeralakshmi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Veeralakshmi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Mrh Electronics Vs the Registrar

M/S.Dharani Hitech Project Ltd. Vs the General Manager

Indian Broadcasting and Digital Vs Ministry of Electronic and Information

R.M.Thandayuthapani Vs Vijayakumar

M.Harikrishnan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Senthil Nathan Vs Kr.Palaniappa Chettiar