M.Aysha Parveen v. The State Rep. by its
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed by wife of convict seeking transfer of husband between prisons and quashing of an order was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Writ petition filed by wife of convict seeking transfer of husband between prisons and quashing of an order was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
WRIT PETITION NO.12382 OF 2021 AND W.M.P.NO.13158 OF 2021
M.Aysha Parveen W/o.Mohamed Zahir ... Petitioner
.Vs.
PRAYER:-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in No.m.m.No.39953/c.n.2/2020 dated 26.03.2021 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to re-transfer the convict, namely, Mohamed Zahir S/o.Muthu Mohamed (C.T.No.3395) from Central Prison, Vellore to Central Prison, Puzhal-I.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Saifulla
For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Government Advocate [Crl.side]
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J]
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gm
To
WRIT PETITION NO.12382 OF 2021
UM(CO)
PBS/18/08/2021
M.Aysha Parveen
The State
P.N.PRAKASH
R.PONGIAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court