Disposed

M.Janarthanam v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC4 Jun 2021WP/12327/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition seeking ordinary leave for a life convict for his son's wedding. The respondent authorities stated the representation was being processed for verification. The court directed the second respondent to decide on merits by 10.06.2021.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to dispose of the representation dated 05.05.2021 on merits before 10.06.2021.

M.Janarthanam Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.06.2021

¶2

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH and

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

¶4

W.P.No.12327 of 2021

¶5

M.Janarthanam, S/o.Mathaiyan

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

¶9

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Vellore Range, Vellore - 2.

¶10

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore - 2. ... Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.05.2021 and grant 30 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's father namely, Mathaiyan, son of Govindasamy, aged 56 years, Life Convict, Ct.No.2375, Central Prison, Vellore.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondents : Mr.J.C.Durairaj Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]

¶15

This petition has been filed for release of one Mathaiyan, son of Govindasamy, aged 56 years, Life Convict No.2375, lodged in Central Prison, Vellore, on leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, on the ground that the son of Mathaiyan is getting married on 14.06.2021. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation dated 05.05.2021 to the respondents, seeking leave for Mathaiyan under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents.

¶17

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions,

¶18

submitted that, the representation dated 05.05.2021 has been received and the authorities are processing the same, in order to verify about the veracity of the marriage.

¶19

Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed, with a direction to the second respondent to dispose of the representation dated 05.05.2021, on merits and in accordance with law, on or before 10.06.2021. No costs.

¶20

sri

¶21

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Secretary to Government,
the State of Tamil Nadu,
Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons,
Vellore Range, Vellore - 2.
3.The Superintendent of Prison,
Central Prison,
Vellore - 2.
4.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
W.P.No.12327 of 2021
RK(CO)
EU 4.6.2021

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Janarthanam v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Janarthanam v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Poornima Vs the Additional Chief Secretary to Government

Gomathi Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by

R.Akila Vs the Secretary to the Government

P.S.Murthi Vs P.S.Vijay

Kumar Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Police

Seenu @ Seenuvasan Vs State through Its