Allowed

M/s.Iifl Home Finance Ltd. v. The Chief judicial Magistrate

Madras HC7 Jun 2021WP/12280/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to expeditiously dispose of a request under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, holding that no adjudication or notice is required and directing disposal within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to deal with the request under Section 14 of the Act and provide requisite assistance within six weeks.

M/s.Iifl Home Finance Ltd. Vs The Chief… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.06.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.SANJIB BANERJEE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

W.P.No.12280 of 2021

¶8

M/s. IIFL Home Finance Ltd. Formerly known as India Infoline Housing Finance Ltd. (IIFL) Having its registered office at 12-A-10, 13^th Floor, Parinee Crescenzo C-38 & C-39, G Block Behind MCA, Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra East, Mumbai 400 051. Branch Office presently at: 3^rd Floor, Kences Towers New No.1, Ramakrishna Street North Usman Road, T.Nagar Chennai 600 017 Through its Authorised Officer T.Vijayakumar .. Petitioner Vs. The Chief Judicial Magistrate Chengalpet District. .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to expeditiously dispose of the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act and received by the respondent on 07.01.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.269/2020 pending before the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balasubramani ORDER (Made by the Chief Justice)

¶9

The petitioning secured creditor seeks a direction on the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet to expeditiously dispose of a request filed under Section 14 of the

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

¶12

In view of the nature of the order sought and the order proposed to be made, no previous notice is required to be issued to the respondent. No notice is also required to be issued to the debtor in view of the scheme of Section 14 of the said Act.

¶13

Section 14 of the said Act contemplates executive assistance to be provided to a secured creditor answering to that description as defined in the Act to have access to the security interest or papers pertaining thereto. The exercise contemplated under Section 14 of the Act does not require any adjudication. Certain declarations are required to be furnished by a secured creditor. The veracity of the declarations cannot be gone into by the authority receiving a request under Section 14 of the Act; such authority has to take the declarations at face value and provide the assistance as sought in accordance with law.

¶14

Accordingly, it is imperative that a request made by a secured creditor under Section 14 of the Act is expeditiously dealt with, since the scheme of the Act is to ensure that the securities are dealt with and the money that is blocked is available to the system upon the secured asset being sold in accordance with law.

¶15

W.P.No.12280 of 2021 is disposed of by requesting the respondent Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet to deal with the petitioner's request under Section 14 of the Act filed on January 07, 2020 in accordance with law and provide the requisite assistance, if and to the extent permissible, within a period of six weeks of the receipt of a copy of this order. There will be no order as to costs.

¶16

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶17

//True Copy//

¶18

kpl To

¶19

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Chengalpet District.

¶20

W.P.No.12280 of 2021

¶21

RP(CO) A.SK(22.06.2021)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Iifl Home Finance Ltd. v. The Chief judicial Magistrate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Iifl Home Finance Ltd. v. The Chief judicial Magistrate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.T.Sundaravadivelan Vs The District Collector

V.Deivam Vs The District Collector

M.Michael Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

P.Lakshmanan Vs The District Collector

D.I,Nathan Vs The Chief Secretary

G.Vivekanandan Vs The Chief Secretary