Petitioner sought mandamus directing respondents to consider a bid application for franchise allotment. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the bid period had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.NO.11769 OF 2011
M/s.Mahaveer & Co., Prop. Narendra Kumar, Lodha & Sons, HUF No.38, Mookthal Street, Purasawakkam, Chennai - 600 007. ... Petitioner
Versus
... Respondents
PRAYER:-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's Bid Application submitted on 10.01.2011 for Allotment of Franchise for Area of Chennai Urban II, Flower Bazaar and communicate the same to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Hanumantha Rao
For Respondents : Mr.B.Mohan
O R D E R
The present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's Bid Application submitted on 10.01.2011 for Allotment of Franchise for Area of Chennai Urban II, Flower Bazaar and communicate the same to the petitioner.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrr
To
V Floor, Anna Road,
Chennai - 600 002.
W.P.NO.11769 OF 2011
RP(CO) PBS/03/08/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Mahaveer & Co., Prop. Narendra Kumar
The General Manager, (Sales and Marketing - CM) BSNL
The Deputy General Manager (Finance) BSNL
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
