Writ petitioner sought a writ of mandamus regarding an inquiry sent by respondents. Court closed the petition granting liberty to approach authorities afresh without costs.
Liberty to approach the concerned authorities afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 23.07.2021
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.11411 of 2011
M/s.United Telecoms Ltd., having office at 18A/19, Doddanekundi Industrial Area, Mahadevapura Post, Bangalore - 560 048, by its Authorised Signatory Shri.Ajaykumar Radhakrishnan
...Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to take the objections/ representations of the petitioner entity into consideration in the enquiry made by them on the representation of the 3rd respondent herein dated 14.09.2009.
| For Petitioner | : | Mr.B.Satish Sunder |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent - 1 | : | Mr.T.Poornam |
| Respondent - 2 | : | Mr.J.Madhanagopal Rao, |
| Senior Standing Counsel |
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that this writ petition may be closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities afresh.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrr
To
The Registrar of Companies, E Wing, 2nd Floor, Kendriyasadana, Koramangala, Bangalore - 560 034 INDIA
+1cc to Mr.T.Poornam, Advocate, S.R.No.35388
W.P.No.11411 of 2011
PCH(CO)
CT(12/08/2021)
M/s.United Telecoms Ltd.
The Regional Director, The Reserve Bank of India
The Registrar, The Registrar of Companies
M/s.United Communications (Mauritius) Ltd.
R.Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
