Allowed

Fathima Parveen v. The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining

Madras HC1 Jun 2021WP/11065/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking release of a seized vehicle. The Court directed the respondents to release the car to the petitioner within seven days, subject to the payment of a deposit, execution of a personal bond with sureties, furnishing an undertaking not to use the vehicle for illegal activities, and participation in any enquiry.

What did the court decide?

The vehicle was directed to be released to the petitioner within 7 days upon satisfaction of conditions including a deposit of Rs.50,000, a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and an undertaking for

Fathima Parveen Vs The Assistant Director of Geology and… — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.06.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

¶6

W.P.No.11065 of 2021

¶7

Fathima Parveen,
W/o Mohamed Meeran .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Assistant Director of
Geology and Mining,
Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

¶8

The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Thiruthuraipoondi, Tiruvarur District.

¶9

The Inspector of Police,
Muthupettai Police Station,
Tiruvarur District. .. Respondents

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's Swift Dzire Car bearing Registration No.TN-99-B-4875, seized by the third respondent on 31.05.2019 to the petitioner.

¶11

For petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatesan

¶12

For respondents : Mr.Richardson Wilson, Govt. Advocate

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(The Order of the Court was made by R.Subbiah,J)

¶15

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's Swift Dzire Car bearing Registration No.TN-99-B-4875, seized by the third respondent on 31.05.2019 to the petitioner.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶18

According to the petitioner, the respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 31.05.2019 on the ground of illegal mining and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had been passed by the respondents. Hence, she has come forward with the present Writ Petition.

¶19

On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like sand, and there was no valid permit and hence the vehicle was seized.

¶20

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the respondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish in its value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii) :

¶22

(i) The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.

¶23

(ii) The petitioner is directed to execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.

¶24

(iii) The petitioner is directed to give an undertaking before the respondent(s)/authority concerned stating that she will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondent(s) and also the trial Court, failing which the respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle.

¶25

(iv) The petitioner is directed not to alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings, if any, before the authority concerned.

¶26

(v) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry, if any, to be conducted by the respondent(s).

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

¶29

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

cs
To
1. The Assistant Director of
Geology and Mining,
Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Thiruthuraipoondi, Tiruvarur District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Muthupettai Police Station,
Tiruvarur District.
+1cc to Mr.M.Venkatesan, Advocate, S.R.No.27393
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.27334
W.P.No.11065 of 2021
RLD(CO)
CB(09/07/2021)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Fathima Parveen v. The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fathima Parveen v. The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Margaret Elizabeth Rani Vs S.Kannan

R.Sadasivam Vs Mohansundar

The Managing Director Vs Nithya Devi

D.Mathiyazhagan Vs The District Collector

M.Arun Kumar Vs The District Collector

Pannerselvam@Panneer Vs I Two Distribution