The Court, upon the petitioner's prayer regarding the lockdown impeding filing of proceedings, extended an interim injunction for two weeks and modified the April 15, 2021 order. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs.
Extended the injunction for two weeks and modified the order dated April 15, 2021 to such effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Eighth day of July Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT
HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WMP No.13957 of 2021 IN WP.6402/2020 S.BALAKRISHNAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR [ RESPONDENTS ] TIRUPPUR 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPPUR 3 THE TAHSILDAR PALLADAM 4 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANK OF INDIA, AVINASHI BRANCH, 3/45, WARD NO.3, SREENIVASAPURAM, COIMBATORE MAIN ROAD, AVINASHI, TIRUPPUR-641 654. 5 THE MANAGER BANK OF INDIA, AVINASHI BRANCH, 3/45, WARD NO.3, SREENIVASAPURAM, COIMBATORE MAIN ROAD, AVINASHI, TIRUPPUR-641 654. 6 THE ZONAL MANAGER COIMBATORE ZONE, BANK OF INDIA, GROUND STAR HOUSE, 324, OPPANAKARA STREET, COIMBATORE 641 001.
7 E.PRABHU, PROP. SENTHIL MURUGAN TEX, S/O.MR.R. EASWARAN, AT S.F.NO.116, CHETTIPALAYAM ROAD, CHINNIAGOUNDANPALAYAM, PALLADAM, TIRUPPUR 641 654.
8 MR.R.EASWARAN, S/O.RENGASAMY GOUNDER RESIDIGN AT S.F.NO.116, CHETTIPALAYAM ROAD, CHINNIAGOUNDANPALAYAM, PALLADAM, TIRUPPUR 641 654.
9 C.SHANMUGASUNDARAM, S/O. CHINIYAGOUNDER,
DOOR NO. 4, GANDHI NAGAR,
KUNIYAMUTHUR, COIMBATORE 641 008.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time granted in WP.No. 6402/2020 IN WMP.NO.13957 OF 2021.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.R.DEEPAK, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.P.MUTHUKUMAR, STATE GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE on behalf of the 1 TO 3 Respondents the court made the following order:-
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The application has been made in a petition which has been disposed of by an order dated April 15, 2021.
From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format VC (12/07/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the injunction restraining disposal of property should be extended due to lockdown impediments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Balakrishnan
The District Collector
Sanjib Banerjee
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
