Writ Appeal for restoration of electricity connection dismissed for non-prosecution as appellant's counsel reported lack of instructions; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
The Writ Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A(MD)No.817 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.03.2021
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
W.A(MD)No.817 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
Maheswaran : Appellant / Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Hon'ble Member/Secretary, The Central Empowered Committee, II Floor, Chankkiapuri,
New Delhi – 21.
3.The Junior Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Pudukadai (Distribution), Kanyakumari District. : Respondents/Respondents
Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent Act, against the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.12746 of 2012, dated 28.09.2012.
Prayer in WP(MD). 12746/ 2012 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the records of the 3rd Respondent in Ka.Yen.E.Ni.Po./VI/Pudhu/Co.Kattu/A.Yen.248/2012, dated 05-09-2012 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary and unenforceable consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to restore the Electricity connection of the Petitioner for S.C.No.191-021329 (TNEB) Pudukadai (Distribution) Kanyakumari District, until the disposal of the representations given by the petitioner to the 1st Respondent dated 27-06-2012 and 05-09-2012.
1/3
W.A(MD)No.817 of 2012
For Appellant : Mr.M.R.S.Prabhu For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA , J. )
Today, the matter has been listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that he has 'no instructions' from the appellant.
3.Since the learned counsel for the appellant reported 'no instructions' from the appellant, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, it is open to the appellant to file a petition to set aside the dismissal order, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
vsn
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
2/3
W.A(MD)No.817 of 2012
To
1.The Hon'ble Member/Secretary, The Central Empowered Committee, II Floor, Chankkiapuri, New Delhi – 21. 2.The District Forest Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The Junior Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Pudukadai (Distribution), Kanyakumari District. +1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-10562[F] dated 11/03/2021 )
Judgment made in W.A(MD)No.817 of 2012 10.03.2021
KM (23.03.2021) 3P 5C
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maheswaran
The Hon'ble Member/Secretary, The Central Empowered Committee
The District Forest Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil
The Junior Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Pudukadai
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
S.KANNAMMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
