The Writ Appeal arising from a writ petition seeking quashing of a tax demand order against a vehicle was dismissed as the appellant voluntarily withdrew the appeal.
The Writ Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A(MD)No.696 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
W.A(MD)No.696 of 2012 and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
P.Jayaprakash ... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
The Regional Transport Officer, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District.
... Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 29.06.2011 made in W.P(MD)No.13940 of 2011 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 13940 of 2011 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Fwpg;ghiz vz;.63206/c1/96 dated 14.11.2011 demanding tax in respect of the petitioner's vehicle TAS 5315 and quash the same.
For Appellant : Mr.A.C.Asaithambi For Respondent : Mr.K.P.Narayana Kumar
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.)
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
1/2
W.A(MD)No.696 of 2012
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AE)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
ps
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
The Regional Transport Officer, Tiruchirappalli, Trichy District.
+1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-8209[F] dated 02/03/2021 )
W.A(MD)No.696 of 2012
01.03.2021
VB (10.03.2021) 2P 3C
2/2
JAYAPRAKASH
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, TIRUCCHIRAPPALLI
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
S.KANNAMMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
