Disposed
M.Vedanayaki v. the Chairman
Madras HCWA/914/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order closes the writ appeal by recognizing the filing of a newer writ petition, leaving the appellant liberty to prosecute the subsequent petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal closed; liberty granted to prosecute Writ Petition No.13300 of 2021; no costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 15.12.2021
¶3
CORAM :
¶4
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY AND
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
¶6
Writ Appeal No.914 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
¶7
M.Vedanayaki
¶8
...Appellant/Petitioner
¶9
Vs.
¶10
- The Chairman, State Bank of India, Mumbai.
¶11
- The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.
¶12
- The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, HR Section, Network II, Administrative Office, Kurinji Complex, State Bank Road, Coimbatore.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M.Vedanayaki
- respondent
The Chairman, State Bank of India, Mumbai
Coram
AI extract
M. Duraishwamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court