Dismissed

Imc Ltd., a Company v. Kamarajar Port Limited

Madras HC29 Sept 2021WA/287/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed two writ appeals filed by IMC Limited under Letters Patent against a lesser single judge's order. The appeals were withdrawn by the appellant's counsel after a representation was submitted to the Government of India.

What did the court decide?

Both writ appeals (W.A.Nos. 287 and 288 of 2017) were dismissed as withdrawn; Connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.

Imc Ltd., a Company Vs Kamarajar Port Limited — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 29.09.2021

¶3

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI W.A.Nos.287 and 288 of 2017 and CMP.Nos.4582 to 4584/2017 and 12302/2018

¶4

IMC Limited, A company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, having its Registered Office at : 232/A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 020 rep. by its Power of Attorney Mr.M.R.Lakshminarayanan ... Appellant in both W.As. -vs-

¶5

Kamarajar Port Limited, Port Administrative Building, Vallur, Chennai-600 120, rep. by General Manager (CS&BD) ... 1^st respondent in W.A.287/2017

¶6

Union of India rep. by the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Shipping, Transport Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001. ... 2^nd Respondent in W.A.287/2017 & respondent in W.A.288/2017

¶7

Prayer: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Common Order of the learned Single Judge made in W.P.Nos.36423 and 36424/2016 dated 20.12.2016.

¶8

Prayer in WP.No.36423 of 2016: Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus directing to call for the records pertaining to the request for Qualifications dated June 30, 2016 for the development of Marine Liquid Terminal-II issued by 1^st Respondent and quash clause 2.2.1 of the Request for qualifications for the Marine Liquid Terminal-II at kamarajar port dated June 30, 2016 issued by the 1^st respondent and consequently direct 1^st respondent to allow the petitioner or its associate to participate in the request for qualifications for the development of Marine Liquid Terminal-II at kamarajar port dated June 30, 2016 tendering process and pass such further or other orders.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

Prayer in WP.No. 36424 of 2016: Writ of Declaration that the Policy No.PD-24018/8/2009/-PD.III New Delhi-1 dated August 02 , 2010 on Policy for Preventing Private Sector Monopoly in Major Ports and all consequential clauses in tenders including request for qualifications for the development of Marine Liquid Terminal-II at Kamarajar Port dated June 30, 2016 issued by Kamarajar Port Limited issued pursuant to Policy No.PD/24018/8/ 2009-PD.III New Delhi-1 dated August 02 2010 on Policy for Preventing Private Sector Monopoly in Major Ports be struck down as unconstitutional arbitrary unreasonable and having no rational basis and pass such further or other orders.

¶11

For 1^st Respondent : Mr.Krishna Pandian in W.A.287/2017

¶12

For 2^nd Respondent in: Mr.B.Sudhir Kumar W.A.287/2017 and respondent in W.A.No. 288/2017

¶13

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶14

(Judgment of the Court was pronounced by T.RAJA.J)

¶15

These Writ Appeals have been directed against the Common Order of the learned Single Judge made in W.P.Nos.36423 and 36424/2016 dated 20.12.2016.

¶16

When these Writ Appeals were called today, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant in both these Writ Appeals, on instructions from his client submitted that the appellant has resorted to make a detailed representation to the Government of India to consider their request, therefore, the present Writ Appeals may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶17

Recording the submission of the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, both these writ appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

tsi

¶23

¶24

The Union of India, Government of India, Ministry of Shipping, Transport Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.V.Anantha Natarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.51171 +1cc to Mr.B.Sundhir Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.50420 +1cc to Mr.K.Gowtham Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.50412

¶26

W.A.Nos.287 and 288/2017

¶27

JP-II(CO) SB(01/12/2021)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Imc Ltd., a Company v. Kamarajar Port Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imc Ltd., a Company v. Kamarajar Port Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pillappa Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

S.P.Velayutham Vs Asset Reconstruction

D.Vijayalakshmi Vs State Rep.by the Chief

The Management of Murali Vs the Presiding Officer

S.Veera Raghavan Vs the Commissioner and Special Commissioner of Land Administration

A.Jayaraman Vs the District Collector