Partly allowed

Gajini v. Savier Rosario

Madras HC24 Feb 2021TR CMP(MD)/30/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, dismissed a stay application with regard to an extension granted to the Family Court, Thanjavur, for disposing of an original diary order paper, holding that the explanation provided by the court was satisfactory but no further extension would be entertained.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time by three months granted for disposal of I.D.O.P.No.373 of 2020 by Family Court, Thanjavur; no further extension allowed.

Gajini Vs Savier Rosario — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

¶3

Monday,the Thirty First day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶6

TR CMP(MD). No.30 of 2021

¶7

Gajini

¶8

... Petitioner/Respondent

¶9

¶10

Savier Rosario

¶11

... Respondent/Respondent

¶12

Prayer :-

¶13

This Transfer of Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 24 of C.P.C. to withdraw the case in I.D.O.P.No. 373 of 2020 from the file of the Family Court, Trichy to the file of the Family Court, Thanjavur and consequently direct the transferee court to deal with the said case in accordance with law.

¶14

ORDER:-

¶15

This Civil Revision Petition coming on for hearing on this day in the caption for ''Extension of time'' and upon perusing the earlier order of this court dated 24/02/2021, and the requisition letter submitted by the Judge Family Court ,

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

Thanjavur ,vide in letter D.No.445/2023 dated 26/07/2023, this Court made the following order:

¶19

By an order of this Court dated 14.07.2023, an explanation was called for from the learned Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur in respect of the non-disposal of I.D.O.P.No.373 of 2020 even though twice the time was extended for disposal of I.D.O.P.

¶20

Pursuant to the above direction of this Court, the learned Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur by his letter dated 26.07.2023 bearing reference D.No.445/2023, has given explanation for non-disposal of I.D.O.P.

¶21

Being satisfied with the explanation given by the learned Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur in the said letter dated 26.07.2023, time for disposing the I.D.O.P. is extended by another three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that no further extension of time will be entertained by this Court.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II) // True Copy //

¶23

/08/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/3

¶26

¶27

THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, THANJAVUR.

¶28

COPY TO: THE REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL), MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

ORDER DATED : 31/07/2023

¶30

==========================

¶31

ORDER

¶32

==========================

¶33

TR CMP(MD). No.30 of 2021

¶34

Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶35

MK/16.08.2023 3P 3C

¶36

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/3

Gajini v. Savier Rosario

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajini v. Savier Rosario

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.v.Perumal Asari Vs Abdul Shalam(Died)

B.Rajaram Vs Muniasamy

T.J.S.Mothilal Vs Nagalakshmi

H.Syed Mathani Vs N.M.Shahul Hameed

M.Vinitha Priya Vs v.Karthick

Vigneswari Vs D.Deepak Kumar