Dismissed

R.Anbalagan v. S.Saranya

Madras HC16 Feb 2021TR CMP(MD)/265/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition seeking transfer of a Family Court matter was heard. The Court granted the Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur an extension of two months to dispose of specific interim applications, citing the prevailing pandemic conditions, hence dismissing the transfer in interim merits.

What did the court decide?

Time extending by two months for disposal of specific interim applications in the main petition.

R.Anbalagan Vs S.Saranya — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

TR CMP(MD). No.265 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

¶3

Friday, the Sixth day of August, Two Thousand and Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Honourable Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

TR CMP(MD). No.265 of 2020

¶7

R.Anbalagan ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

S.Saranya ... Respondent/Respondent

¶10

Prayer :-

¶11

This Transfer Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, praying this Honourable Court to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2018 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Thanjavur renumbered as H.M.O.P.No.14 of 2019 on the file of the Honourable Family Court, Thanjavur and transfer the same to any other competent Court, Thanjavur District to try the same.

¶12

ORDER:- This Petition coming upon for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, the earlier order dated 16.02.2021 passed in this petition and the Letter in D.No.345/2021 dated 29.06.2021, received from The Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur and in the presence of Mr.S.Jayachandran, Advocate for the Petitioner this Court made the following Order:

¶13

The matter is placed before this Court on the letter received from the Court below seeking extension of time for disposal of I.A.Nos.9,10 and 11 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.14 of 2019.

¶14

The learned Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur had sought for extension of two months and considering the prevailing pandemic situation, this Court feels it appropriate to extend the time by two months and accordingly, it is extended by two months from the date of receipt of communication from the Registry.

¶15

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

TR CMP(MD). No.265 of 2020

¶21

The Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur.

¶22

Copy to:

¶23

The Section Officer Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶24

ORDER DATED : 06/08/2021

¶25

========================== ORDER

¶26

==========================

¶27

TR CMP(MD). No.265 of 2020

¶28

Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶29

(CO) TR(12.08.2021) 2P C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

R.Anbalagan v. S.Saranya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Anbalagan v. S.Saranya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kondakalliammal, Vs Sankaranarayanan

V.Muthumariammal@Reena Vs B.Rajaram

D.Pavithra, Vs Issac Prem Ananth

Durai (Deceased) Vs Thangavel

Kamatchi, Vs Rajesh @ Vetharaj

Anandh Vs Vennila