Allowed

M.Haripoorna v. P.Ramkumar

Madras HC23 Nov 2021TR CMP(MD)/241/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a petition under Section 24 CPC to transfer a miscellaneous petition from the Family Court, Tirunelveli, to the Family Court, Madurai. The transfer was to be tried jointly with a restitution petition pending in Madurai due to the resident status of the petitioner and the respondent's residence in Chennai.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P. No. 79 of 2021 from Family Court, Tirunelveli to Family Court, Madurai to be tried along with H.M.O.P. No. 319 of 2021.

M.Haripoorna Vs P.Ramkumar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.241 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.241 of 2021

¶4

and C.M.P.(MD) No.4545 of 2021

¶5

M.Haripoorna

¶6

... Petitioner/Respondent

¶7

-vs-

¶8

P.Ramkumar

¶9

... Respondent/Petitioner

¶10

Prayer:- Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw and transfer H.M.O.P.No.79 of 2021 pending on the file of Family Court, Tirunelveli to Family Court, Madurai.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Godwin For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Jawaharlal

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This petition has been filed by the petitioner/wife, seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No.79 of 2021 pending on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli to the file of the Family Court at Madurai.

¶14

2.Records would show that the wife has also filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights before the Family Court, Madurai in H.M.O.P.No.319 of 2021.

¶15

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a resident of Madurai, since she is now residing with her parents after leaving the matrimonial home.

¶16

4.Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the respondent is working at Chennai.

¶17

5.Considering the fact that the respondent's petition for divorce is filed and pending before the Family Court at Tirunelveli for which he has to travel from Chennai to Tirunelveli, interest of justice would be subserved, if H.M.O.P.No.79 of 2021 pending on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli is transferred to the file of the Family Court, Madurai to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.319 of 2021, since the Family Court, Madurai is also vested with the jurisdiction to hear the said petition.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.Learned counsel for the respondent requests this Court to

¶19

1/2

¶20

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.241 of 2021

¶21

dispense with the presence of the respondent.

¶22

7.Considering the fact that the respondent is now working at Chennai, the presence of the respondent is dispensed with for the regular hearing, except for counselling and for adducing evidence.

¶23

8.The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶24

Assistant Registrar (A.D I)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

abr

¶27

Note:-In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

1.The Judge, Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶30

2.The Judge,

¶31

Family Court, Madurai.

¶32

+1 CC to M/s.C.GODWIN, Advocate ( SR-35690[F] dated 24/11/2021 )

¶33

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.241 of 2021 23.11.2021

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

M.Haripoorna v. P.Ramkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Haripoorna v. P.Ramkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Pushpam Vs S.Murugeswari

G.Venkatesan, Vs Central Bank of India

A.Vijhay Pragash, Vs a.Kumaraswami

P.Pavithra Vs M.Chandrasekar

M.Murugeswari Vs M. Nagaraj

S.Mariyammal Vs M/S.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.