Allowed

S.Xavier Amalanathan v. R.Anitha Santhanamary

Madras HC29 Jun 2021TR CMP(MD)/178/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 24 CPC to transfer a suit for property declaration and possession from the Mahila Court to the Family Court. This would allow trial along with pending divorce, maintenance, and injunction cases filed by the parties in the same Family Court to ensure uniformity and expeditious disposal.

What did the court decide?

O.S.No.74 of 2021 transferred from District Judge (Mahila Court), Tiruchirappalli to Family Court, Tiruchirappalli for joint disposal with I.D.O.P.No.35 of 2017, O.S.No.22 of 2018, and M.C.No.123 of 2

S.Xavier Amalanathan Vs R.Anitha Santhanamary — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.178 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :29.06.2021

¶3

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶4

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.178 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3393 of 2021

¶5

S.Xavier Amalanathan ... Petitioner/Plaintiff

¶6

-vs-

¶7

R.Anitha Santhanamary

¶8

... Respondent/Defendant

¶9

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the O.S.No.74 of 221 on the file of the learned District Judge, Tiruchirappalli (Mahila Court) and transfer the same to the learned Family Judge Court at Tiruchirappalli, to be tried along with I.D.O.P.No.35 of 2017, O.S.No.22 of 2018 and M.C.No.123 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned Family Judge Court at Trichirappalli.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan For Respondent : No appearance

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the O.S.No.74 of 221 on the file of the learned District Judge, Tiruchirappalli (Mahila Court) and transfer the same to the learned Family Judge Court at Tiruchirappalli, to be tried along with I.D.O.P.No.35 of 2017, O.S.No.22 of 2018 and M.C.No.123 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned Family Judge Court at Trichirappalli.

¶13

2.The petitioner has filed O.S.No.74 of 2021 before the learned District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, for declaration that the suit property belongs to him absolutely and seeking the relief of recovery of possession of the same and I.D.O.P.No. 35 of 2017 was filed before the Family Court, Trichirappalli, for divorce. The respondent as guardian of the minor daughters filed a suit in O.S.No.22 of 2018 before the Family Court, Trichirappalli, for maintenance and also for permanent injunction and M.C.No.123 of 2019 was filed by the respondent before the Family Court, Trichirappalli, for her maintenance.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/3

¶16

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.178 of 2021

¶17

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the facts and the dispute arising out of all the four cases are one and the same and the evidence adduced by the parties in one proceeding may affect the other. He would further submit that if the proceedings are tried by different courts, it would lead to conflicting decisions. Therefore, the petitioner seeks to transfer the suit in O.S.No.74 of 221 to the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli, to be tried along with I.D.O.P.No.35 of 2017, O.S.No.22 of 2018 and M.C.No.123 of 2019.

¶18

4.Though the name of the respondent is printed in the cause list, the respondent has not chosen to appear either in person or through counsel duly instructed.

¶19

This Court considered the arguments made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶20

This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, O.S.No.74 of 2021 is withdrawn from the file of the learned District Judge, Tiruchirappalli (Mahila Court) and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli, for disposal as per law. The District Judge, Tiruchirappalli (Mahila Court), is directed to transmit the papers to the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli, forthwith. The Judge, Family Court, Tiruchirappalli, is directed to dispose of O.S.No.74 of 2021 along with I.D.O.P.No.35 of 2017, O.S.No.22 of 2018 and M.C.No.123 of 2019, on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶22

In fine, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

msa/cp

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

2/3

¶27

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.178 of 2021

¶28

To:

¶29

1.The Judge, Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.

¶30

2.The District Judge, Tiruchirappalli (Mahila Court).

¶31

Order made in Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.178 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3393 of 2021

¶32

Dated: 29.06.2021

¶33

AS(05.07.2021) 3P 3C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

3/3

S.Xavier Amalanathan v. R.Anitha Santhanamary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Xavier Amalanathan v. R.Anitha Santhanamary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Nithya Vs K.B.Kumaresan

J.Madhan, Vs R.Nagasoundarya

Murugalakshmi, Vs Backiyaraj

M.Divya, Vs S.Karthick

Veeralakshmi Vs Jeyachandran

K.a.Murugappan Vs C.Thangapandian