Allowed

Jegadeswari, v. Loganathan

Madras HC27 Apr 2021TR CMP(MD)/136/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a transfer civil miscellaneous petition to move a divorce case from the Sub Court, Theni, to the Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur, citing the petitioner's difficulty in traveling due to distance and lack of male support.

What did the court decide?

H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2021 withdrawn from Sub Court, Theni and transferred to Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur for expeditious disposal.

Jegadeswari, Vs Loganathan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tr CMP (MD) No. 136 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.136 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2628 of 2021

¶4

Jegadeswari ... Petitioner/Respondent -vsLoganathan ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶5

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw and transfer H.M.O.P.No.18 of 20212 from the file of the Sub Court, Theni, to the file of the Principal Sub Court, Srivilliputhur.

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu For Respondent : Mr.V.Selvakumar

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2021 from the file of the Sub Court, Theni, and transfer the same to the file of the Principal Sub Court, Srivilliputhur.

¶9

2.H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2021 was filed by the respondent/husband before the Sub Court, Theni, for divorce.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has no male member to come with her for attending the case except her younger brother and since the petitioner's father expired, she is living with her mother only. The distance between Theni to Srivillputhur is 150 kms. In such circumstances, the petitioner could not able to travel to Theni from Srivilliputhur for attending every hearing in H.M.O.P.No.18 of 2021. Therefore, the petitioner seeks transfer of H.M.O.P.No. 18 of 2021 to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur.

¶11

4.The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the respondent has no objection for transferring the case. However, he prays for expeditious disposal.

¶12

5.This Court has considered the submissions made on either side.

¶13

This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by both counsel, H.M.O.P.No.18 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

¶16

Tr CMP (MD) No. 136 of 2021

¶17

2021 on the file of the Sub Court, Theni, is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur for disposal as per law. The Subordinate Judge, Theni, is directed to transmit the papers to the Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur forthwith. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur is directed to dispose of H.M.O.P. No. 18 of 2021 on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶18

This petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (T&P)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

cm/msa

¶23

To: 1. The Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur. 2. The Sub Court, Theni

¶24

Order made in Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.136 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2628 of 2021

¶25

Dated: 27.04.2021

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

Jegadeswari, v. Loganathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jegadeswari, v. Loganathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Suvitha Vs S.R.Pearlson Sam Chellakumar

Masanam Vs P.Ramar

S.Surya Prabha Vs S.Venkatesan

The Chief Engineer, Vs B.Raja

Dr.Thilak Kiruba Vs the Commissioner

Selvaraj Vs the Sub Inspector of Police