Bharath Kumar v. S.Gayathri
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the CPC for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple listing dates.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Bharath Kumar ...Petitioner
Vs S.Gayathri ... Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., praying to transfer the F.C.O.P.No.326 of 2020 pending before the Family Court, Erode to the Family Court at Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : No appearance
The Matter was listed for hearing on 15.02.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Once again, the case is listed on 23.02.2021, under the caption “for dismissal”. But, today (i.e., 01.03.2021) also none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
- Thus, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for Non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar //True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bharath Kumar
- respondent
S.Gayathri
Coram
S.M. Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court