Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
918 & 919 of 1997
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TCMP.Nos.917, 918 & 919 of 1997 in
TCP.SR.Nos.97069, 97070 & 97071 of 1997
R. MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
These petitions are filed by the petitioner/ revenue seeking to condone the delay of 1250 days in representing the above TCP.SR.Nos.97069, 97070 & 97071 of 1997
2.Heard both sides.
- Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and being satisfied with the same, the delay is condoned and these petitions are accordingly, ordered.
[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 18.11.2021
msr
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 1250 days in representing the petitions can be condoned on the grounds stated in the affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THE REVENUE
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court