Disposed

M/S.Avm Film Studios v. Income Tax Officer

Madras HC4 Feb 2021TCA/51/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court bench disposed of three Income Tax Appeals filed by AVM Film Studios against the ITAT without deciding the merits. The appeal was dismissed solely because the assessee had already filed forms under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Tax Case Appeals disposed; Substantial Question of Law left open; Liberty to restore appeals if final scheme decision is adverse.

M/S.Avm Film Studios Vs Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tax Case Nos.50 to 52 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 04.02.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
Tax Case Appeal Nos.50 to 52 of 2016
M/s.AVM Film Studios,
38, Arcot Road, Vadapalani,
Chennai ... Appellant in all 3 TCAs
Vs.
Income Tax Officer,
Media Ward – I,
121, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent in all 3 TCAs

¶6

Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras "B" Bench, dated 08.07.2015 passed in I.T.A.Nos.2000/Mds/2012, 1358/Mds/2015 and 1359/Mds/2015. For Appellant : Mr.V.S.Jayakumar (in all 3 TCAs) For Respondent : Ms.V.Pushpa, (in all 3 TCAs) Standing Counsel

¶7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶8

Page 1/5

¶9

Tax Case Nos.50 to 52 of 2016

¶10

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J)

¶11

These appeal filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income

¶12

Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), are directed against the order dated

¶13

08.07.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench, Chennai ('the Tribunal' for brevity) in I.T.A.Nos.2000/Mds/2012, 1358/Mds/

¶14

2015 and 1359/Mds/2015 for the Assessment Years 2008-09, 2007-08 and

¶15

2011-12. The above appeals were admitted on 25.01.2016 on the following

¶16

Substantial Question of Law for consideration:

¶17

“Whether the Tribunal is right in holding that the receipt of money in entirety received by the assessee upon lease of distribution, execution of pictures, assignment of veo rights, etc., is taxable as income upon the interpretation of Sections 4, 5 and 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the income admitted by the assessee on a proportionate basis is not acceptable?””

¶18

We have heard Mr.V.S.Jayakumar, learned counsel for the appellant/ assessee and Ms.V.Pushpa, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/ Revenue.

¶19

It may not be necessary for this Court to decide the Substantial Question of Law framed for consideration on account of certain subsequent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 2/5

¶20

Tax Case Nos.50 to 52 of 2016

¶21

developments. The Government of India enacted the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) to provide for resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act of the

¶22

Parliament received the assent of the President on 17^th March 2020 and

¶23

published in the Gazette of India on 17^th March 2020.

¶24

We are informed by the learned counsel for the appellant/assessee that

¶25

the assessee has already filed the requisite Forms 1 & 2, in all the three appeals on 10.12.2020 under Section 4 of the Act.

¶26

In the light of the fact that the assessee has already availed the benefit

¶27

under the Act, no useful purpose would be served in keeping these appeals pending. At the same time, safeguarding the interest of the assessee in the event

¶28

the order to be passed by the Department under the Act is not in favour of the

¶29

assessee. Accordingly, the Tax Case Appeals stand disposed of on the ground that the assessee has already filed the requisite Forms 1 & 2 in all the three

¶30

appeals and the Department shall process the application at the earliest in accordance with the said Act and communicate the decision to the assessee at the earliest. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore these appeals

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶32

Page 3/5

¶33

Tax Case Nos.50 to 52 of 2016

¶34

in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the Forms filed by the assessee
under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer
is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any
application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeals and
on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for
Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench
for orders.
6. With this observation, the Tax Case Appeals stand disposed of with
the aforementioned liberty and consequently, the Substantial Question of Law
is left open. No costs.
[ M.D., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.]
Index : Yes/No 04.02.2021
Internet : Yes
va
To
1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras "B" Bench
2.Income Tax Officer,
Media Ward – I,
121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶36

Page 4/5

¶37

Tax Case Nos.50 to 52 of 2016

¶38

M. DURAISWAMY, J. and T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.

¶39

¶40

Tax Case Appeal Nos.50 to 52 of 2016

¶41

04.02.2021

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶43

Page 5/5

M/S.Avm Film Studios v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Avm Film Studios v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Commissioner of Income Vs Celebrity Fashions Ltd.

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Elgi Equipments

The Commissioner of Income- Vs Tuticorin Port Trust

Durai Sathymurthy Vs the Dy Commissioner of Income

Shri.N.Rajasekaran Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S.Avm Film Studios Vs Income Tax Officer