The Income Tax Appellant abandoned this appeal before the High Court because the tax effect fell below the threshold limit specified in Circular No. 17/2019. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn
The Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 02.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
T.C.A.No.144 of 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. ... Appellant/Appellant
vs.
M/s. BNT Connections Impex Ltd., No.41, KKR Avenue, Moolakadai, Perambur, Chennai. - 600 011.
... Respondent/Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, “C” Bench, dated 17.09.2012 in ITA.No.1287/Mds/2012 for the Assessment Year 2008-09 preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) III, Chennai 34 dated 12.03.2012 made in ITA.No. 701/2010-11/A-III filed against the Assessment under of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle – I (2), Chennai 34 dated 28/12/2010 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009.
For Appellant : Mr.T. Ravikumar Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr. R. Sivaraman
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
We have heard Mr.T. Ravikumar, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr. R.Sivaraman for the respondent/Assessee.
3.The appeal was admitted on 11.01.2016 on the following substantial question of law:
“ Whether, on the facts and circumstances https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right
in holding that diversion of borrowed funds for investment in its subsidiary would not lead to disallowance of interest under section 36(1) (iii)?"
4.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.
5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj
To
1.The Assistant Registrar,
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai, “C” Bench.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (A),
121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai 34.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Company Circle – I (2),
Chennai 34.
+1cc to Mr.T.Ravikumar, Advocate, S.R.No. 5428
T.C.A.No.144 of 2013
RSI(CO) GN(22/02/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai
M/s. BNT Connections Impex Ltd.
M. Duraismamy
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
