Karuppaiah, v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.92 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
S.A(MD)No.92 of 2011
Karuppaiah
... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,
Karaikudi.
2.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Collectorate,
Sivagangai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Karuppaiah
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Karaikudi
- respondent
The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Collectorate, Sivagangai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court