Baskar v. Philomi
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants' counsel reported lack of instructions from clients.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.32 of 2011
THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.04.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.32 of 2011
1.Baskar
2.Thanapal 3.Ramasamy Nadar ... Appellants -Vs-
1.Philomi 2.Suresh 3.Annamalai ...Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.2 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tuticorin, dated 22.12.2009 confirming the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.183 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin, dated 20.04.2007.
For Appellants : Mr.R.Manimaran For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants reports no instructions. He states that he had already written to the clients but the clients have not got back to him. The second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Baskar
- appellant
Thanapal Ramasamy Nadar
- respondent
Philomi
- respondent
Suresh
- respondent
Annamalai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court