Paytharasu v. Preethi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the second appeal by the appellant as it had abated because the appellant was deceased without legal heirs being brought on record. The other miscellaneous petition was also closed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated; MP(MD)No.3 of 2012 closed. No costs.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 20.04.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
SA(MD)No.287 of 2012 and MP(MD)No.3 of 2012
Paytharasu ... Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
Preethi ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to allow the second appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 16.07.2010 made in A.S No.1 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar confirming the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2008 made in O.S No.43 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Virudhunagar and thus render justice.
For Appellant : Ms.Lakshmi Gopinathan For Respondent : Mr.G.Mariappan
JUDGEMENT
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Paytharasu
- respondent
Preethi
Coram
G.R.Swaminathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court