Muthuravi, v. Shanmugakani
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed under S. 100 CPC seeking to set aside a decree was dismissed as this Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal requested by the appellants' counsel.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.176 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
S.A.(MD)No.176 of 2019 and CMP(MD).No.3910 of 2019
1.Muthuravi 2.Raja
3.Muthammal ... Appellants/Respondents 3 to 5 /Defendants 3 to 5
Vs.
1.Shanmugakani 2.Ramesh 3.Maheswari ...Respondents 1 to 3/ Appellants/Plaintiffs
4.The Superintendent of Police Thoothukudi Thoothukudi District
5.The Tahsildar Taluk Office Thoothukudi ...Respondents 4 and 5/Respondents 1 and 2 /Defendants 1 and 2
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, to set aside the decree and judgment in A.S.No.77 of 2013 on the file of Subordinate Court, Thoothukudi dated 03.01.2019 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.364 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi, dated 02.08.2013.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1.Muthuravi 2.Raja 3.Muthammal
- respondent
1.Shanmugakani 2.Ramesh 3.Maheswari
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police Thoothukudi
- respondent
The Tahsildar Taluk Office Thoothukudi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court