Peter v. Soosaimariyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court disposed of a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code. The bench heard arguments and found the lower courts' decision unassailable, dismissing the appeal and confirming the decree below.
What did the court decide?
Judgment and decree of the courts below confirmed; Second Appeal dismissed; No costs awarded.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Nineteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN SA(MD). No.139 of 2011
- PETER 2. Chellaiah 3. Eskkithai 4. Muthukumar ... Defendants/Appellants/ Appellants
Vs
1 SOOSAIMARIYAN 2 KANNIMARIYAL ...Plaintiffs/ Respondents/ Respondents
Prayer:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.NO.97 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Thoothukudi,dated 31.08.2010, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Sathankulam, passed in O.S.NO.60 of 2006 dated 26.10.2007.
DECREE:-
This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on this date, upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of MR.R.BALAKRISHNAN, Advocate for the Appellants and of JESSI JEEVA PRIYA, Advocate for the respondents, this Court doth order and decree as follows:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grounds raised in the second appeal warrant interference with the judgment and decree of the courts below.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Peter
- applicant
Chellaiah
- applicant
Eskkithai
- applicant
Muthukumar
- respondent
Soosaimariyan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court